 |
| Recent
Articles |
IT Analyst Firms Help In Purchasing Decisions
The Motley Fool has a pretty interesting article on IT analyst firms such as Gartner & Forrester. I've worked with these firms for nearly a decade and do believe that they provide a valuable service to their customers and...
Marketing IT Services
This month's BrandingWire challenge comes from the business to business sector. A small, Canadian IT services company (ITCo) wants to brand itself more effectively. ITCo asks: "How can providing IT...
CMDB Dream Team
One of the issues dogging the CMDB hype cycle is the steep requirements for architecting and implementing such systems, even when based on vendor products. Expertise from a wide variety of domains is called...
The Evolving Domain Language Of IT
One of the hallmarks of mature professions is that they have a clear and detailed language - a domain (or universe) of discourse or an ontology. In the...
Souce Code's Value
In the past week I heard about two fairly large companies who are in a bit of a jam. Back in the days of the Internet Boom, they purchased an "E-commerce server" from one of two separate niche software vendors (i.e. ISVs).
What You Need To Know About The New Version Of...
The Information Technology Infrastructure Library (ITIL) v3 was released in June 2007, seven years after the last critical ITIL methodology update. With this new update has come a renewed interest in the ITIL framework...
Where IT Is Going
Over the last couple of days, I have been at a security conference in NY City, and it has proven to be very interesting in the end not just to hear about what pain people have, but in general, where major industry...
|
|
10.10.07
Viable Alternative To SCO OpenServer?
 By
A.P. Lawrence
I was a little surprised by this Newsgroup thread that began with asking "With the chapter 11 filing and other recommendations, what is a good, long time viable alternative to SCO OpenServer? "
Some posters apparently don't feel there's any need to move on.. and I bet there are people reading this of the same or similar opinion.
OK, I agree with part of the argument: there is no reason to panic, and there's no reason to toss out SCO instantly. But I do insist that it is far past time to be looking into moving on. If you have easily moved apps, maybe there's nothing more you need to do than note the cost and leave it at that for now. If your apps are not so easily moved, you have more work to do, and harder decisions to make.
But don't get complacent. If you wait too long, you'll find yourself facing the kind of mess described at options you don't have for getting data off of a Xenix box. Note this paragraph particularly:
* hd transplant to new hardware to continue to run xenix - if you can find a 486-100 or slower box that actully runs, reliably. (think 20 year old dried out capacitors all out of spec making the circuit unstable at the very least, if not a fire hazard! Not kidding! Seen it! Caps out of spec, so voltage regulator circuit out of spec, cooked several parts of the board, dried up stickers on components and on circuit traces caught fire!
Yes, right now it's easy to find hardware that can still run SCO - the newer version will run even on brand new equipment. But that's
going to change: as hardware advances, even SCO 6 will fall away and be "uninstallable". Sure, Ebay can keep you in spare parts for many a year, but those parts will be getting older and older.. just like the warning about finding old Xenix hardware, anything that
can run SCO will be creaking and dusty. This is no great long range plan.
Cost Effective Website and Network Monitoring
IPCheck Server Monitor - Free Download |
|
If you accept that sooner or later you WILL have to move off SCO (if you can't accept that at all, well, there's just no hope for you), you have to think about software, even if that is an easy migration now. Here's why: there's little doubt that app vendors will stop upgrading their SCO versions soon if they have not done so already. "So what?", you say, "This version is fine for now, and probably will be for years."
Yeah, maybe so. But come the day you do have to convert to the vendors Linux (or, shudder, Windows) version, will they still be able to convert your data? Maybe not: as they move forward while you stay stubbornly clinging to your old SCO, they may change file structures or even change the entire database system to take advantage of new capabilities on more modern systems. Maybe they still have something that can help migrate your data, but maybe
not, and the longer you wait, the more chance you are left high and dry.
Don't put this off too long. There are plenty of resources here to help you: Self Defense for SCO Users is a good place to start. I also have a small pile of articles related to converting from SCO at Converting SCO to Linux.
*Originally published at APLawrence.com
|
