 |
| Recent
Articles |
Marketing IT Services This month's BrandingWire challenge comes from the business to business sector. A small, Canadian IT services company (ITCo) wants to brand itself more effectively. ITCo asks: "How can providing IT services...
CMDB Dream Team One of the issues dogging the CMDB hype cycle is the steep requirements for architecting and implementing such systems, even when based on vendor products. Expertise from a wide variety of domains is called...
The Evolving Domain Language Of IT One of the hallmarks of mature professions is that they have a clear and detailed language - a domain (or universe) of discourse or an ontology. In the...
Souce Code's Value In the past week I heard about two fairly large companies who are in a bit of a jam. Back in the days of the Internet Boom, they purchased an "E-commerce server" from one of two separate niche software vendors (i.e. ISVs).
What You Need To Know About The New Version Of... The Information Technology Infrastructure Library (ITIL) v3 was released in June 2007, seven years after the last critical ITIL methodology update. With this new...
Where IT Is Going Over the last couple of days, I have been at a security conference in NY City, and it has proven to be very interesting in the end not just to hear about what pain people have, but in general, where major industry...
|
|
09.28.07
IT Analyst Firms Help In Purchasing Decisions
By
Savio Rodrigues
The Motley Fool has a pretty interesting article on IT analyst firms such as Gartner & Forrester.
I've worked with these firms for nearly a decade and do believe that they provide a valuable service to their customers and the IT market in general.
Some metrics for Gartner: "Each year, Gartner's 650 researchers attend 18,000 vendor briefings, along with answering 240,000 client inquiries."Obviously, not every client inquiry is of equal weight, but these numbers work out to 1.5 client inquiries per researcher per weekday.
Let's set aside the client inquiry figure, which, even if each inquiry was from a different customer we're only covering a very small subset of IT buyers. Even if a company is not a Gartner, Forrester, IDC, RedMonk, 451 Group or Entiva (etc.) customer, the company will be influenced by what these analysts say in the public media.
Analysts help customers make purchase decisions. Analysts also educate the market on new technologies. Even in open source land, the IT manager and CIO of a developer using your OSS product is much more likely to take something serious if they hear it from Gartner, Forrester or IDC first. Working with the large analysts will help your OSS business if you want *paying* customers in the enterprise. Boutique analysts like RedMonk, 451 Group or Entiva are going to be crucial in developing/refining your OSS business strategy. However, because of their size, these boutique analysts don't have the reach of a Gartner or Forrester in terms of customer purchase decisions. You'll need to work with both classes of analysts, because each bring a lot of (differentiated) value to the table.
BTW, the article also makes the case against using analysts: "The current model of analyst-intermediated, opinion-based technology buying and selling produces poor financial returns. Across the world, corporate managers spend more than $1 trillion a year on technology. To help managers invest, and technology marketers persuade, $2 billion a year is spent on technology analysts. Yet 70% of projects fail to deliver a financial return, according to the Standish Group and other commentators."(Funny enough, Standish Group is also an analyst firm). Should analysts bear the weight of these 70% of projects that fail? Would fewer projects fail if analysts were not involved in the equation? What is the ratio of project failures for similar companies that use analysts vs. companies that don't?
Questions, questions, question…I better call an analyst ;-)
PS: I should state: "The postings on this site are my own and don't necessarily represent IBM's positions, strategies or opinions."
Comments
About
the Author:
Savio Rodrigues is a product manager with IBM's WebSphere Software division. He envisions a day when open source and traditional software live in harmony. This site contains Savio's personal views. IBM does not necessarily agree with the views expressed here.
|
|