|
| Recent
Articles |
Specializations For Outsourcing
Google's in the press again, and this time about information security, and a host of other "specializations" that can be, and maybe should be outsourced. In "Out Souring the Grunge Work," I talked about taking...
Understanding The Basics Of ITIL
In the world of IT management, ITIL is the buzzword being heard around the globe. So what is ITIL and how does it affect your organization? Let's take a closer look! Today's IT management has become more and more complex causing organizations worldwide to seek...
Is IP Your Most Cost Effective Choice?
Too often a business assumes that IP based solutions are the best choice to satisfy their communication requirements. Particulalrly with convergence issues. But....don't get caught making a hasty decision. There are viable options...and factors to consider before...
Choosing The Right Project Management Software
Project management continues to become an important and popular topic today. This is understandable because project management done correctly will help an organization get better at what it does, and make...
Go Administrate With Codework
The need for efficient control within the company network to safeguard assets and maintain productivity has fallen hard onto the shoulders of system administrators everywhere. Employees and employers in a modern business, complete with high-speed access to...
IT Security: The Actuarial Table
Earlier this week I talked about building out an actuarial table for defining risk in information security as something that would work in helping information security professionals being insured against the work that...
Malpractice In Information Security?
Interesting QA over at CSO Security Counsel today with Dan Greer trying to define what is information security malpractice, and the most interesting part is that today, we can't define it. Dan Greer states: Malpractice insurance would assume that we know what malpractice is...
|
|
02.02.07
An Appropriate S, G & A For "IT As A Business"?
 By
Charles Betz
Your CMDB budget depends on it...
Last of tonight's triple play (I must be feeling inspired).
Let's consider the "Run IT as a Business" concept. Let's say your IT budget is $250 million for a $25 billion corporation.
The accountants probably consider that amount part of your corporation's SG&A (selling, general, and administrative expense). You're a paltry 1 percent of that overall revenue base.
But what if you were your own $250 million firm, managing an IT value chain for your (now separate) client? What if you had your own P & L?
Well, you would have overhead: salaries, rent, heat, lights, and (just like your parent company) you would have IT. What would your IT look like?
It would be all the stuff you use to run the ITSM processes:
• Help Desk
• Management Framework
• Portfolio Management
• CMDB
• CASE & architecture tools
• Provisioning system
and the like. (See A simplified ERP for IT architecture )
You would be entitled to your own budget for these tools. I think 1% is a bit paltry - why not say 3%? That would be a healthy budget of $7.5 million per year for your internal IT tooling. Not enough to purchase all of it at once, but certainly enough to implement a sound infrastructure and keep it supported over time.
Are you spending 3% of your organization's overall IT budget on your internal tools? More? Less?
At least it's a baseline thought experiment that may prove useful to some of you if the business is questioning why you need to spend money on a CMDB.
Thoughts?
Comments
About
the Author:
Charles Betz is a Senior Enterprise Architect, and chief architect for IT
Service Management strategy for a US-based Fortune 50 enterprise. He is author of the forthcoming Architecture and Patterns for IT Service
Management, Resource Planning, and Governance: Making Shoes for the Cobbler's Children (Morgan Kaufman/Elsevier, 2006, ISBN 0123705932). He is the sole author of the popular www.erp4it.com weblog.
|
|
